A tree farm near Pedee

The homestead story that wasn’t.

Sullivan Tree Farm: Sections 28 and 33, Township 9 South, Range 6 West, Willamette Meridian, west of Pedee, Polk County, Oregon · See the Surveyor’s Walk card

“Was this land homesteaded around the turn of the century, the way the old management plan says?”

The question · First claims and owners
Reading level KidPlainScholar The wording changes. The facts don’t.

Written by AI

The Sullivan Tree Farm is a 211-acre tree farm just west of Pedee in Polk County, Oregon, in Sections 28 and 33 of Township 9 South, Range 6 West. For years the farm’s management plan said the land “was homesteaded around the turn of the century.” The records tell an older story: two pioneer land claims surveyed in 1855, railroad grant land, and one thin strip of homestead land, about 7 acres. Family stories are like fence lines: handy, old, and not always where the surveyor put them.

A larger piece of the 1855 township plat: Sections 29, 28 and 27 above 32, 33 and 34, with dwellings labeled Tedroe, Johnson and Taylor and the lettering “Level prairie and soil 1st rate.”
The 1855 township plat, wider. The large numbers are sections: 29, 28 and 27 across the top, 32, 33 and 34 below. Find the small black squares labeled “Tedroe,” “Johnson” and “Taylor,” and “Level prairie and soil 1st rate” curving up from Section 33. The small figures along the lines, such as 80.07, are lengths in chains. Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office. A public record of the United States, retrieved by the landowner.
Part of the Donation Land Claim plat of T. 9 S., R. 6 W.: claims drawn across the section lines, each with its owner’s name, number and acreage, including John W. Tedrow’s Claim 54 and John Johnson’s Claim 53.
The Donation Land Claim plat. Each claim carries its owner’s name, number and acreage, and the claims cut across the section lines. John W. Tedrow’s Claim 54 runs up the page in Section 33, marked 322.00 acres; John Johnson’s Claim 53 lies to the northeast. Just right of the Tedrow claim’s top edge is a small lot marked 6.93. The red numbers (1a, 2a and so on) mark the small lots left between claim lines and section lines. Dated 1861 in the landowner’s files; that date has not been re-checked. Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office. A public record of the United States, retrieved by the landowner.
A handwritten page of Thomas H. Hutchinson’s 1855 field notes for the Tedrow claim, stamped 0351.
Hutchinson’s field notes, 1855: the last page of the Tedrow claim survey, stamped 0351. The heading names Claim 54, T. 9 S., R. 6 W., and John W. Tedrow. Read down for “fir & oak timber” (spelling regularized), “but little improvement,” “the rich prairie” and the date, “10th Aug 1855.” Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office. A public record of the United States, retrieved by the landowner.

What the record shows

From the record Written by AI

Deputy Surveyor Daniel Murphy ran the section lines around what is now the farm on March 13–16, 1854, and he was not crossing empty country. His notes keep stopping to take compass sightings on houses: Mr Tedroe’s, Mr Johnson’s, Taylor’s. Halfway down the west side of Section 33 his post fell “in dooryard,” 39 links (about 26 feet) from Mrs Gillam’s dwelling. Tedroe and Gillam are his spellings; the later patents read Tedrow and Gilliam.

“Mr Tedroe’s dwelling bears S 51½° W.”

Deputy Surveyor Daniel Murphy, March 1854, from the section corner just east of the farm

Source: Murphy, Daniel. Field notes of the subdivision of T. 9 S., R. 6 W., Willamette Meridian, 1854–55. BLM Oregon State Office, vol. R0029 (as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

The township map drawn from Murphy’s notes was approved on May 1, 1855. Small black squares mark the dwellings labeled Tedroe, Johnson and Taylor, and lettered across Section 33 and on to the northeast is a verdict any farmer would envy: “Level prairie and soil 1st rate.”

“Level prairie and soil 1st rate.”

General Land Office township plat, approved May 1, 1855, lettered across Section 33 and on to the northeast

Source: General Land Office township plat, T. 9 S., R. 6 W., approved May 1, 1855. BLM Oregon State Office (as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026; see the first picture above)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

The settlers Murphy sighted held their land as Donation Land Claims, and each claim got a survey of its own. Deputy Surveyor Thomas H. Hutchinson did them in 1855: Mary Gilliam’s claim on July 13–14, John W. Tedrow’s on August 10–11 and John Johnson’s on September 14–15. BLM’s index says 1856; the field notes are dated 1855, and we follow the notes.

“10th Aug 1855”

Deputy Surveyor Thomas H. Hutchinson, 1855, Field notes of the Tedrow claim survey, page 351

Source: Hutchinson, Thomas H. Field notes of the Donation Land Claim surveys, T. 9 S., R. 6 W., 1855. BLM Oregon State Office, vol. D0022 (as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026; the date line is on page 351, the third picture above)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

About 150 of the farm’s acres lie in Claim No. 54, the 322 acres of John W. and Rachel Tedrow. Hutchinson’s summary: little improvement yet, but valuable for its timber along the Luckiamute and its rich prairie.

“There is but little improvement on the claim — but it is valuable on account of the timber on Luckiamute river and the rich prairie.”

Deputy Surveyor Thomas H. Hutchinson, August 1855, Field notes of the Tedrow claim survey, page 351

Source: Hutchinson, Thomas H. Field notes of the Donation Land Claim surveys, T. 9 S., R. 6 W., 1855. BLM Oregon State Office, vol. D0022, page 351 (as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

About 12 more acres, on the east side, lie in Claim No. 53, the 323.5 acres of John Johnson. Of that claim Hutchinson wrote that three fourths was rich level prairie and one fourth timbered, and that it was highly improved. Johnson even had a “new barn.”

“Three fourths of this claim is rich level prairie, one fourth is timbered. The claim is highly improved.”

Deputy Surveyor Thomas H. Hutchinson, September 1855, Field notes of the Johnson claim survey

Source: Hutchinson, Thomas H. Field notes of the Donation Land Claim surveys, T. 9 S., R. 6 W., 1855. BLM Oregon State Office, vol. D0022 (as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026; page not given)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

Hutchinson tied both houses to one corner, Johnson’s southwest corner, which lies inside today’s farm: “Tedrow’s house” stood S 40° E, 100 links (66 feet) from it, and “Johnson’s house” N 40° E, about 6 chains (about 396 feet). Plotted on the county map, both sites fall inside the farm, only about 400 feet apart. These are plotted positions, not discoveries: nobody has yet walked the sites with the notes in hand.

“Tedrow’s house”

Deputy Surveyor Thomas H. Hutchinson, 1855, Tie from the southwest corner of the Johnson claim

Source: Hutchinson, Thomas H. Field notes of the Donation Land Claim surveys, T. 9 S., R. 6 W., 1855. BLM Oregon State Office, vol. D0022 (as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026; house sites plotted there on Polk County map layers, approximate)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

Reading every bearing tree out of the two surveyors’ notes for 13 corners on and near the farm gives 23 trees: 11 white oak; 4 “oak,” kind not stated; 2 each of ash, alder and cherry; 1 willow; and 1 “red fir,” the surveyors’ name for Douglas-fir. That is 15 oaks and only one Douglas-fir. Hold the picture loosely: these are trees the surveyors chose, a small sample, not a survey of the vegetation.

Source: Murphy, Daniel. Field notes of the subdivision of T. 9 S., R. 6 W., Willamette Meridian, 1854–55. BLM Oregon State Office, vol. R0029; Hutchinson, Thomas H. Field notes of the Donation Land Claim surveys, T. 9 S., R. 6 W., 1855. BLM Oregon State Office, vol. D0022 (the tally of 23 bearing trees as counted in the landowner’s history, October 2026)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

The farm’s 211 acres left federal ownership through five patents, probably six. The two claims were patented in 1877. About 31 acres on the west, never part of a claim, passed to the Oregon & California Railroad under its federal land grant, by patents of 1897 and 1899. An 1871 railroad patent appears to cover a strip of about 7 acres in the northeast, the 6.93-acre lot on the old claim plat; that match is an inference, and nobody has looked at the patent itself. Estimated from county map layers, the pieces add up to about 207 of the 211 acres.

Source: BLM General Land Office Records (land patents) and BLM Historical Index, T. 9 S., R. 6 W. (looked up by the landowner; as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

The only homestead land on the farm is a strip about 138 feet wide along most of its north edge, in Section 28: about 7 acres. Charles W. Pagett received a Homestead Act patent for 104.35 acres there on October 12, 1900, and the farm holds its southern edge. Pagett was not the first to try: the federal index lists three earlier homestead entries on the same tract, made in 1881, 1886 and 1887, all cancelled, the last in October 1894.

Source: BLM General Land Office Records (land patents) and BLM Historical Index, T. 9 S., R. 6 W. (looked up by the landowner; as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

Forest historian Bob Zybach caught the error. Donation Land Claims could no longer be started after 1855: Congress kept the donation law in force only “until the first day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty-five,” that is, December 1, 1855. The Homestead Act became law on May 20, 1862, and settlers could enter land under it from January 1, 1863. So the 1855 claims cannot be homesteads, and the only homestead land here is the 1900 strip.

“extended and continued in force until the first day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty-five”

Act of Congress amending the Donation Land Act, section 5, February 14, 1853, 10 Stat. 158 (U.S. Statutes at Large, official scan)

Source: Act of Feb. 14, 1853, ch. 69, § 5, 10 Stat. 158; Homestead Act of May 20, 1862, ch. 75, 12 Stat. 392 (entries from January 1, 1863) (Homestead Act scan: govinfo.gov, STATUTE-12-Pg392; Dr. Zybach’s point as reported in the landowner’s history)

Report an error
Added by the owner Written by AI

Before 1989 the whole property was fenced and grazed by cattle, the farm’s management plan says. About 1976 Publishers Paper planted the open areas with Douglas-fir seedlings, each in a tube to keep the deer off. WTD Industries bought the land in 1988, built dirt roads and in the spring of 1989 logged nearly all the merchantable timber. In 1990 the bare ground was replanted: two plantings of about 25,000 Douglas-fir seedlings each.

Source: Sullivan Tree Farm Management Plan (2012), as summarized in the landowner’s history (October 2026) (the history notes that the plan’s word “homesteaded” is wrong for most of the land)

Report an error
From the record Written by AI

For most of the twentieth century the best record is the view from above: U.S. Department of Agriculture aerial photographs from 1936, 1955 and 1978, free on Oregon Digital in the “Aerial Photos, Mid-Willamette” collection. 1936 shows a patchwork of dark tree clumps and lighter open ground; 1955, open grassland with scattered trees; 1978, more trees, about two years after the planting. Fitted to today’s map by matching roads, they are good only to 100 to 250 feet: they show what grew where, not where a corner is. They are not shown here.

Source: USDA aerial photographs, Polk County, 1936–1978, in Oregon Digital, “Aerial Photos, Mid-Willamette” (Oregon State University) (as transcribed in the landowner’s own history of the farm, October 2026)

Report an error

What the record can’t say

Written by AI

  • Gap in the record Who bought out the claimants and the railroad, and how the pieces came together under one owner: the county deed books have not been opened yet.
  • Gap in the record Whether the 1871 railroad patent really covers the 7-acre strip is an inference; nobody has looked at the patent itself.
  • Gap in the record Every position here is plotted from county map layers, not surveyed. Nobody has walked the house sites and corners with the notes in hand, and most of the witness trees are surely long gone.
  • Gap in the record Who the Tedrows and Johnsons were beyond the survey is not settled: the family accounts are unconfirmed and disagree in places, and which John Johnson held Claim 53 is an inference from a cemetery record.
  • Gap in the record How people lived on this ground before the surveyors came: the files used here are nearly silent. The Native people of the Willamette Valley are generally known as the Kalapuya, but that is regional background, not this property’s record, and a published account of the Luckiamute country still has to be added.

What to look up next

Written by AI

  1. Read the claimants’ own sworn statements

    Each Donation Land Claim has a file of sworn statements: when the settlers arrived, married and settled. For these two claims they are on National Archives microfilm M815 (Oregon City certificates 4751 and 4753); the history notes copies are free on FamilySearch.

    Bring back: Arrival, marriage and settlement dates, and the names exactly as the claimants signed them.

  2. Trace the deeds from 1877 forward

    The county deed books carry the story from the patents to today. Start with the grantor and grantee indexes under the Tedrow, Johnson, railroad and Pagett names.

    Bring back: Each deed’s date, the names on both sides, and the book and page.

  3. Look at the patents and the homestead file

    Find each patent on BLM’s General Land Office Records site, then order Pagett’s homestead case file (final certificate 5919) from the National Archives. Patents that are not scanned, including the 1871 railroad patent, can be asked for at BLM’s Oregon State Office public room.

    Bring back: The patent images, and from the case file when Pagett settled and what he built.

  4. Read the rest of the surveyors’ notes

    BLM’s survey records page for Township 9 South, Range 6 West lists the plats and the field-note books (Murphy’s vol. R0029, Hutchinson’s vol. D0022). The pages not yet copied out are waiting there.

    Bring back: The surveyors’ words for every line and corner of the farm, with volume and page.

  5. See the land from the air

    The 1936, 1955 and 1978 photographs came from Oregon Digital. Oregon State University’s collections and the University of Oregon’s aerial photography service hold many more flights.

    Bring back: The date, flight and frame number of each photo that covers the land.

  6. Ask the tribes’ own history offices

    For the people who lived here before the surveyors, go to the tribes’ own offices rather than to us. The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde and the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians both have cultural resources programs for western Oregon.

    Bring back: A published account you can cite, and their permission for any use of tribal cultural information.

Written by AI An AI-written summary of the landowner’s own history of this farm, “Rich Prairie, White Oak, Douglas-fir” (October 2026), which draws on BLM survey, plat and patent records; the law is quoted from the U.S. Statutes at Large. Pictures: Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office, retrieved by the landowner.

Historical research, not title research. For ownership questions, talk to a title company or an attorney.

Now try your own place Bring boots; the corner posts won’t come to you.

Back to top